Easy question.Why is this glDrawArrays failing?

I was drawing a HUD and I noticed the following code with glDrawArrays doesn’t work. If I use 3D points it does work.


    GLfloat x = 100;
    GLfloat y = 100;
    GLfloat w = 50;
    GLfloat h = 50;
    GLfloat box[2*3][2] = {
            { x,   y },
            { x,   y-h },
            { x+w, y },

            { x+w, y },
            { x, y-h },
            { x+w, y-h }
    };
    glColor4f(1,1,1,1);
#if 0 
    glEnableClientState(GL_VERTEX_ARRAY);
    glVertexPointer(2, GL_FLOAT, 0, &box[0][0]);
    glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, 2*3);
    glDisableClientState(GL_VERTEX_ARRAY);
#else
    glBegin(GL_TRIANGLES);
    glVertex2f(x, y);
    glVertex2f(x, y-h);
    glVertex2f(x+w, y);
    
    glVertex2f(x+w, y);
    glVertex2f(x, y-h);
    glVertex2f(x+w, y-h);
    glEnd();
#endif

With my basic understanding I thought the two bits of code were equivalent. Can someone explain the difference. Thanks!

what is <box[2*3][2]> ?

GLfloat box[2*3] =
{
{ x, y },
{ x, y-h },
{ x+w, y },

        { x+w, y },
        { x, y-h },
        { x+w, y-h }

};
glVertexPointer(2, GL_FLOAT, 0, &box[0]);

It’s a C++ 2D array of GLfloats, 6 rows, 2 columns; 6 rows for 3 points per triangle * 2 triangles and 2 columns for 2 points per vertex. You can see all that from the code though, so I don’t understand why you are asking.

The only reason I define it that way instead of box[12] is I consider it more readable to be able to do box[0][0/1] to access the x,y of the vertex.

As I mentioned if I use 3D points (so box[2*3][3], include a Z in the initialization pass 3 to glVertexPointer) it works.

i knew what it is, just strage because you dont address your glBegin primitves like that. just try to remove it and see what happens.
if other client states are enabled make sure to disable those.
GL_NORMAL_ARRAY, GL_COLOR_ARRAY, GL_TEXCOORD_ARRAY …
or try to specify the actuall stride instead of 0.

if other client states are enabled make sure to disable those.

Ahhh, I had a bug just a few days ago of a missing disable causing a crash…Found another case, fixed it and it all now works (and I now have debug checks to ensure I dont do it again).

Thanks!

yes, if not disabled OpenGL expects them to be bound and reads from them. crash can occur if previous draw used a buffer which is smaller then the one you specified now and this buffer is not disabled.